OrthoPets Blog

About the OrthoPets Toe-Up Sling

Among the many custom pet braces and prosthetics OrthoPets fabricates, we also provide “adaptive devices” to support your dog’s mobility. In some cases, you may notice your dog limping and knuckling at the hind limb and paw. This can sometimes indicate a neurological condition. Some causes of this could be but are not limited to: degenerative myelopathy, spinal trauma, sciatic nerve injury, etc. The Toe-Up Device assists with increasing flexion of the tarsus (hock) while also keeping the hind paw in a corrected normal standing position.

Through the appropriate application and use of an OrthoPets Toe-Up Device, coupled with rehabilitation therapy, your pet can regain lost quality of life, mobility, comfort, and function.

Please feel free to contact us via phone or email with any questions you may have, or you may purchase a Toe-Up with boot through our online shop!

V-OP and the Role of the Veterinarian

Veterinarians have a history of creating assistive devices from items at hand using everything from duct tape to superglue, plywood to low temperature thermoplastics, and aluminum rods to PVC pipe. We have a tradition of a “MacGuyver-like” fortitude driven primarily by economics and a lack of veterinary-specific products in the past. Public demand and the redefined modern role of the companion animal as a family member have provided an opportunity to excel beyond one-off and novelty in veterinary health care. Our clients have recognized there is a gap in veterinary services in terms of managing limb dysfunction and loss, a gap long filled in human medicine.

Scientific rigor and a culture of evidence-informed medicine drive new understanding and ultimately innovative therapies for animals. The structural consequences of a dysfunctional or missing limb or limb segment are now recognized. As our understanding of the intricacies of quadruped mobility and biomechanics has grown, so have the variety and sophistication of mechanical assistive devices. Now they incorporate veterinary-specific hinges, composite plastics, titanium, carbon fiber, and specialty foam liners. Biomechanically sound designs improve fit and function. Surgical techniques such as subtotal amputation, intraosseous transcutaneous amputation prosthesis (ITAP), and rotational plasty are providing new opportunities and an expanding patient population. V-OP is evolving into a new subspecialty. Although it is true that techniques and materials used in H-OP can be translated to veterinary patients, specific modifications for quadruped ambulation and the significantly greater magnitude of force generated by these patients must be considered. A thorough understanding of the biomechanics and health issues of animals is essential to avoid injury to the animal, delayed healing, or delayed use of more appropriate therapies. The veterinarian is the key player in this process and must lead the way because of their knowledge of veterinary species and veterinary medicine. H-OP professionals will continue to serve a collaborative albeit secondary role. To do so, veterinarians must begin to educate themselves in this regard to best serve the demands and needs of their clients and patients.

Origins of V-OP

Human orthotic and prosthetic (H-OP) practice traces its origins to ancient Egypt and Greece. Earliest assistive devices were made of leather and wood. In the 18th and 19th centuries, these materials were replaced with metal. Not surprisingly, the profession of bracing predates surgery; bone setters and appliance makers were skilled artisans. Modern orthopedic surgery rapidly developed in the 20th century with the advent of implants and safer anesthesia; ultimately, surgery replaced bracing and splinting as the cornerstone of orthopedics. Consequently, bracing became ancillary to surgery. In recent years, improved technology has led to substantial improvements in bracing techniques and a more discriminate parsing of surgical vs. nonsurgical cases. A clear example is the decrease in Achilles tendon surgery in favor of dynamic bracing and rehabilitation for human patients.

Today braces are more accurately termed orthoses. Orthoses are defined as any medical device attached to the body to support, align, position, prevent, or correct deformity; assist weak muscles; or improve function.2 The term orthosis implies dynamic control, whereas brace more accurately refers to static control. Both are needed in modern therapy, and “orthosis” is preferred as a general term for both types of mechanical devices. They are not a replacement for necessary surgery, but complementary.

Prosthetists were originally black smiths and armor makers. Materials included wood and leather, calling to mind the classical image of the peg-legged pirate. Later, metal was incorporated albeit lending a great deal of weight to these devices. In modern times, a positive consequence of war, if this can be said, includes medical innovation by necessity. The American Civil War resulted in tens of thousands of catastrophic limb injuries. J.E. Hangar is reportedly the first amputee of that war.3 He subsequently built his own prosthetic leg and ultimately the largest human prosthetic limb fabrication company in the United States, Hanger Inc, publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange as HGR. In the late 1880s, his devices were available by mail order, typically selling for $75- $150, which is approximately $2000-$4000 in today’s dollars. These early devices served an important purpose, but were utilitarian at best and truly uncomfortable at worst.

Once again driven by human conflict, today lightweight materials, microprocessors, and neural integration have resulted in spectacular improvements in function including sensation and lifelike grasping appendages. These devices have allowed amputees to return to and excel in nearly all human endeavors including sport; no longer are these individuals relegated to “getting by” and “making due” with their injury. The goal is to thrive with few or no boundaries. Amputees still face many challenges, and rehabilitation remains critical to successful return to function, but the list of limitations is shrinking.

Over the past decade, there has been a tremendous increase in our understanding of physical fitness for animals coincident with an increased demand for maximizing quality of life for our companion animals. We now know that optimal movement and mobility can significantly affect the physical and mental health of our veterinary patients. Rehabilitation has moved to the forefront of modern veterinary medicine with the debut of the American College of Veterinary Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation.4 Not surprisingly, innovative human orthotists or prosthetists have been tapped to create one-off mechanical appliances to improve the mobility and functionality of the occasional veterinary patient. This seems to mirror the emergence of acupuncture, chiropractic, and rehabilitation therapy for animals in the preceding decades. During this time, human practitioners introduced and, not entirely legally, ministered to veterinary patients owing to a paucity of qualified veterinarians. We are in their debt in terms of introduc- tion; subsequently, veterinary medicine has embraced and advanced these modalities with species-specific scientific vigor. Likewise, many veterinary practice acts have recognized these modalities and redefined the legal use by nonveterinary practitioners. As of this writing, these therapies are emerging as main- stream rather than so-called alternative therapies. Likewise, V-OP is emerging from beneath the wing of H-OP. Recent media productions such as Disney’s A Dolphin’s Tale and PBS’s My Bionic Dog have recently brought V-OP as a therapeutic option to the public eye. Although these productions still leave the viewer with an impression that such cases are yet novelty, this is far from reality and the current state of the science.

February 2018 OrthoPets Case Study for the Canine Rehabilitation Institute: Casey

OrthoPets functions as a virtual clinic and fabrication lab enabling us to virtually work with veterinarians and their patients all around the world. In some unique circumstances we do get to meet our clients and patients in person! In December we were able to meet a sweet Golden Retriever named Casey and his mom, Francie. Casey was a rescue through Golden Retriever Rescue of the Rockies (GRRR) and received amazing veterinary assessments and care. While at one of their galas, his adopted mom received a free voucher for an appointment/assessment with OrthoPets. Casey is 4 years old and was adopted and evaluated at GRRR revealing a mostly unknown trauma/developmental history. It is likely that he was born with a portion of his limb missing, and his owners were worried about him developing compensatory issues to his spine and other limbs if he were to grow up with a partial limb. Casey is a very active boy and lives with 3 other canine siblings resulting in him having high energy “jobs” to do at home. orthopets-casey-xrays-0218.png
When we met Casey, we were provided with radiographs of the affected limb to further assess what was remaining. Martin Kaufmann, our owner, and an OrthoPets case manager took on his in-house appointment and came up with a great solution for Casey’s mobility needs. One of the perks of working with the OrthoPets team is that our case managers are all certified veterinary technicians and are trained by our owner/founder Martin as well Dr. Felix Duerr (our sports med and surgical consult at Colorado State University) to assess candidacy for each case based on x-rays as well as to help determine if any sort of revision surgery may be needed for that patient.
When OrthoPets assesses each prosthetic candidate, there are a few factors which dictate the type of device needed:
  1. Which anatomical joints are present and functional?
  2. What is the length of the residual limb segment distal to the last anatomical joint?
orthopets-casey-paws-0218.pngThe combination of these two factors will translate into the functionality of the device and ultimately serve as a predictor for the success of the case. The minimum requirement for a prosthesis to gain suspension and limb purchase is at least 40-50% of the radius/ulna. For a prosthesis to be functional, the patient needs to have at least a functional elbow joint with active control over elbow flexion and extension to control the ground reaction forces acting against the socket. Distal limb amputations will assist in improved device suspension and increased proprioceptive feedback for the patient.
Casey presented with a great level of limb remaining for suspension of a prosthesis and had minimal discomfort of the limb when palpated. He did palpate with a tight FCU and restricted end extension ROM, which should not cause any discomfort in the prosthesis but was something to note on his exam. He had a very prominent area near what was likely a residual dewclaw. It was also noted that internal rotation of the manus was present. The level of his likely traumatic amputation as a puppy was at the mid metacarpal region. Due to the length of limb distal to the carpus, OrthoPets was not able to provide a hinged prosthesis, but were able to provide a non-hinged below carpus prosthesis with a cranial clamshell (shell closure) and removable foam liner for comfort and ease of replacement in the future.
Casey presented to OrthoPets for his fitting once


his device was ready. A prosthesis will take 7-10 business days to make once OrthoPets has received payment as well as everything needed to process the case. Casey did an excellent job at his fitting and was quite comfortable right away. Martin and the case manager spent a significant amount of time with Casey and his owner at the fitting appointment. Casey started off not wanting to place the limb as consistently as desired, which can be expected at an initial fitting appointment. We worked with him on simple weight shifting and balance exercises, as well as slow and controlled leash walks to encourage proper limb placement at each step. Casey is a very smart patient and by the end of the appointment he was placing his device well about 75% of the time and had even practiced going up and down stairs as well as walking on different types of terrain.

Casey will continue to work on specific rehabilitation exercises at home with his owner to ensure that he continues to do well. His owner reports he is a crazy dog and does laps around the yard in his prosthesis and has no trouble at all with getting around. We cannot wait to keep up with Casey’s progress over the next few months!

January 2018 OrthoPets Case Study for the Canine Rehabilitation Institute: Molly

Molly is a 12-and-a-half-year-old golden retriever who presented for sudden right hind limb lameness at Mission Vet Hospital in July 2017. There, she was diagnosed with a left partial CCL tear, which had been previously diagnosed, a right CCL tear, tarsal hyperextension, as well as osteoarthritis.
In Molly’s case, her owner chose bilateral stifle orthoses due to her age and diagnoses in addition to therapeutic expectations and goals. After we reviewed Molly’s case, it was determined that bilateral stifle orthoses, with an addition of tarsal cuffs, would be the best option for her. Tarsal cuffs were added to Molly’s stifle orthoses to assist in controlling the extent of her tarsal hyperextension, as well as add additional device suspension.
Molly’s left stifle tarsus orthosis received motion limiter hinges restricting abnormal tarsal hyperextension. OrthoPets designed her orthoses with lower resistance hinges on the lateral aspect of her stifle due to her age, along with standard resistance hinges on the medial side ensuring appropriate stifle support.
Once the orthoses were fabricated, they were shipped to the clinic where the referring veterinarian was able to fit them properly and discuss with Molly’s owners the recommended break-in schedule, activity, and return to function. Molly received her right stifle tarsus device in August 2017 and her left stifle tarsus device in November 2017.
Luckily for Molly, her owner had already planned to start her in rehabilitation therapy to assist Molly through her initial device acclimation period and throughout the rest of her pathofunctional recovery.
We followed up with the referring veterinarian and owner to see how Molly has been doing in her bilateral orthoses and received a reply email with an amazing update: “She’s doing well with them, both in walking and in rehabilitation therapy. On a good day, she’ll walk the trails for up to 50 minutes. Not bad for a 12-year-old!!”

Left: Molly’s left stifle cast prior to her orthotic. Right: Molly walking in the woods in her bilateral stifle devices.

Is an orthosis the right solution for you and your pet?

Is an orthosis the right solution for you and your pet?

OrthoPets offers both orthotic and prosthetic devices to help with your pet’s unique case. But what is the difference between the two? Orthotic devices are used to help stabilize an injury or instability. Prosthetic devices are used to replace a partial limb segment and make up a limb length discrepancy for congenital defects or for partial subtotal amputation. Below you will find common orthopedic injuries and instabilities as well as how a device may benefit your pet. All of our devices are designed to assist your pet pre-operatively, post-operatively or in lieu of surgery. Please reach out to one of our Case Managers for more information regarding our prosthetic devices and your pet’s specific case.

Carpal and Tarsal Injuries

Injury to the carpus (wrist) can be complex because it is composed of 3 joints, 6 carpal
bones, 2 antebrachial bones (radius and ulna), and 4 or 5 metacarpal bones. There are multiple ligaments holding this structure together and injuries can occur at any of the joint levels (antebrachiocarpal, middle carpal, or carpometacarpal).

Injury to the tarsus (hock) can be complex because it is composed of 6 joints arranged in 3 levels, 6 tarsal bones, 2 antebrachial bones (tibia and fibula), and 4 (rarely 5) metacarpal bones. There are multiple ligaments holding this structure together and injuries can occur at any of the joint levels (tarsocrural, talocalcaneal, talocalcaneocentral, calcaneoquartal, cetrodistal, and tarsometatarsal).

Clinical signs of carpal and tarsal injuries include lameness, swelling, and mal-alignment. Mal-alignment can include hyperextension and/or increased angling of the paw toward the midline (varus) or away from the midline (valgus). Minor injuries will resolve with rest and a temporary splint, however more severe injuries may require surgery or an orthosis. Additionally, any of the associated bones can be displaced (luxated) or fractured. Injuries to the Achilles complex is covered in another document. Common surgical approaches include repair of large ligament injuries when possible, screw fixation of fractures of the larger bones, partial or complete fusing of the carpus or tarsus so that it no longer bends (articulates). Device design is paramount to success and depends on the type and severity of injury.

Careful consideration is taken in prescribing a device and its specific components. Important clinical variables surround use of a paw segment and whether articulation by way of hinges is possible.

  1. The paw segment is required in the following circumstances: short metacarpal bones, fracture of metacarpal bones, severe hyperextension, middle or distal jointhyperextension, subluxation, more than one plane of instability, excessive dewclaws, deranged digits, flexor tendon failure or shortening at the digits and wounds associated with the paw.
  2. Articulation (hinging) is ideal whenever possible in order to provide as close to normal limb use as possible. With this design, the carpus or tarsus can flex if appropriate and yet be limited to flexion within safe parameters only; this is called an arthrodesis-on- demand. Articulation cannot be provided under the following circumstances: severe carpal or tarsal malalignment, bone tumors near the carpus or tarsus, metacarpal or metatarsal fractures, and non-reducible bone luxations. When articulation is not possible, patients may experience an altered gait in the device.

Stifle Injuries

Injury to the cranial cruciate ligament (CCL, also called the ACL) is the most common
orthopedic injury in the dog. This injury is due to a partial or complete tear of a ligament inside the stifle (knee). The resulting instability leads to pain and arthritis. There is no published study directly comparing use of a custom stifle orthosis to surgical stabilization for CCL injury in the dog.

Stabilization is recommended for best short and long-term function, quality of life, and
comfort. Stabilization is traditionally done surgically either with a joint realignment surgery (TPLO or TTA) or with a pseudo-ligament surgically placed outside the joint (tight rope or lateral suture). These procedures are considered the standard of care. In the past 7 years, the use of a custom orthosis (brace) has become available as an alternative to surgery when surgery is not appropriate for any reason. These reasons may include other health issues, unacceptable surgical or anesthesia risk, advanced age, and financial constraints, among others.

Even with an orthosis, surgery may be required. When the cranial cruciate ligament is
torn sometimes the meniscus is also torn. The middle or medial meniscus is most commonly injured and injury may occur at the time of the initial cranial cruciate injury or any time later due to too much activity on an unstable joint. A torn meniscus is very painful and if not treated it will cause continued lameness despite stabilizing the joint with surgery or an orthosis. If this occurs, a surgical procedure called a partial medial meniscectomy is required.

Because an orthosis is not the correct therapy for all patients, before choosing an orthosis the following points are important to keep in mind:

  1. The device MUST be put on and removed daily. The device is to be used all day every day, but must be removed at night. The orthosis stabilizes the stifle, tarsus or carpus from the outside only when ON, while surgery does so from the inside. The device is not used at night and your dog must not be allowed to move about (jump on or off bed, wander the house, go outside through a dog door, etc.). Wearing schedules vary based on the type of injury.
  2. Adjustments are expected and are a normal part of the custom orthosis process. The device is custom-made for your dog, and every effort is made to accurately fit the device. Two complimentary adjustments are included to help meet the requirements for an appropriate fit; your veterinarian will coordinate these adjustments. Increased activity and activity intensity can expose fit issues requiring further adjustments. Please follow all instructions with on how to monitor your pet, contact OrthoPets as well as your veterinarian promptly if you have concerns. If adjustments are required, it will be necessary to ship the device to OrthoPets with a turnaround time of 1-3 business days excluding shipping time.
  3. Follow-up is critical to success. An orthosis is considered a “durable medical device.” This means that proper use of the device is necessary to meet therapeutic goals and to ensure its safe application over the lifetime of your dog. In the first few months of fitting, your veterinary team, with the help of your OrthoPets case manager, will help coach you with regards to device use and rehabilitation. Annual to twice annual appointments are advised depending on age and activity of your dog. At these appointments, your doctor will thoroughly assess your dog’s orthopedic condition and evaluate the condition and fit of the device.
  4. The role of Rehabilitation. Most dogs adapt quickly to wearing an orthosis, however, behavioral techniques can facilitate this. Your dog will need to learn basic skills while wearing the device, which include: transitions (sitting, lying down, getting upstairs), and moving around on different types of surfaces (ground, carpet, hardwood floor, etc.). Orthopedic injury leads to compensatory abnormal movement and associated muscle strain and weakness. The best way to ensure the highest level of success is to follow recommended rehabilitation schedule and techniques. Each patient’s condition and abilities are unique and as such an individualized rehabilitation program is needed. Your veterinarian can help find a certified rehabilitation professional (CCRT or CCRP) in your area.
  5. A proactive approach to arthritis management is the second key to long-term success. If the joint itself is injured rather than a ligament alone, osteoarthritis may develop. Steps taken early and continued throughout your dog’s lifetime will make a difference in terms of regaining and maintaining comfort and an active life-style well into the senior years. Consult with your doctors for a comprehensive pain management plan.

OrthoPets’ Past and Future

OrthoPets is like nothing you have ever seen in veterinary medicine. OrthoPets
offers custom orthotics (braces) and prosthetics manufactured to the same
standards and with the same bioengineering skill used for human patients in a
full-time on site and virtual clinic with a human orthotist and veterinary specialist
collaborating on every case.


Recognizing a need

The concept of OrthoPets originated in 2003 when Martin Kaufmann, a certified
human ped-orthotist and prosthetist, first applied his training and experience to
the animal healthcare industry. His first patient, Walt, suffered a neurologic injury
and amputation was recommended. Using knowledge of human patients with
similar functional deficits, Martin created an orthotic device to reposition the limb
allowing Walt to walk on four legs again.
This rewarding challenge soon became a full-time pursuit and OrthoPets was
launched as the first dedicated Veterinary Orthotics and Prosthetics (VOP) Clinic
in the world. One by one, Martin helped animals regain the lifestyle they once
enjoyed. OrthoPets grew rapidly and in 2006 moved from the Kaufmann’s
garage to a small manufacturing facility in north Denver. Martin’s wife, Amy,
joined the endeavor as head of sales and marketing. From 2003 OrthoPets
provided mobility solutions to more than 15,000 animals, in all 50 states and on 3

Growing into the Future

In 2014 Dr. Felix Duerr, a board-certified orthopedic surgeon and board-certified
canine sports medicine and rehabilitation joined the OrthoPets team. The
mission envisioned by the Kaufmanns and Dr. Duerr was to positively impact the
quality of life of animal patients and their human companions through innovative
solutions for animal pain and mobility issues. Their purpose was to pioneer the
specialty of VOP as a compliment to existing standards of care through custom
engineered external coaptation (CEEC). Their goal became setting the bar as the
world leader in VOP through creative design, integrity, and service.
With his knowledge of primary veterinary healthcare and his specialized training
in orthopedics and sports medicine is the driving force behind research and
testing. Using the human process as a model, patients at this center will enjoy
the expertise and collaboration of specialists in the fields of modern, integrative
veterinary pain medicine, VOP, and veterinary rehabilitation under one roof. No
such facility exists anywhere in the world.

In response to increased demand and a rapidly developing industry, OrthoPets
moved into their new Westminster Colorado facility in October 2014. More than 4
times larger than the previous facility, the new OrthoPets location houses a full-
time VOP clinic in which cases are collaboratively managed by Martin and a
virtual clinic in which technology (email, skype, video conferencing) allows
national and international patients to receive the services provided in the Denver
clinic, and OrthoPets fabrication lab where custom devices are designed,
manufactured, and refurbished. OrthoPets is available to help you throughout
your journey.

New Tools and Partnership for Veterinarians

VOP is truly a new tool in the veterinarian’s therapeutic repertoire. All devices
are custom manufactured using the same adaptive technologies and materials
developed on the human side. Common devices for the forelimbs include
prosthetics for issues mid antebrachium and below; carpus devices include
solutions for hyperextension, premature physeal closure, collateral ligament
injury, and distal radial neoplasia. Devices for the hindlimbs include prosthetics
for issues at or below the hock; hock injuries amenable to bracing include
hyperextension, achilles tendon injuries (surgical or nonsurgical), collateral
ligament injury, and luxation; stifle braces include solutions for cranial cruciate
injury, luxating patella, and osteoarthritis. Devices are adaptable for use pre-op,
post op, or no op as primary external coaptation, dynamic support, sports
bracing, and limb replacement.

A crucial aspect of the OrthoPets vision and mission is to give each patient a
second chance to enjoy a normal life. By partnering with various animal
healthcare professionals (family veterinarians, veterinary surgeons, veterinary
neurologists, veterinary rehabilitation therapists), OrthoPets has successfully
provided solutions to old problems and created new options never before

Knowledge and Experience Provide Adaptability

Since 2003, OrthoPets has found great success in applying the same adaptive
technologies developed for human orthotics and prosthetics to the care for
animal patients. Use of these devices in animals requires a new way of thinking
because of differences in movement (e.g. 4 legs, wings, hooves, paws), activity
(e.g. agility, sporting, flying, swinging through trees, guarding sheep, sleeping on
the couch!), size (e.g. 5 lb Chihuahua, 800 lb calf), and environment (e.g. carpeted
house, snow, barnyard, zoo enclosure). Understanding biomechanics of
movement and the forces applied to a limb as an animal goes about normal
activity is paramount. Through years of experience and knowledge the
engineers and veterinarians at OrthoPets are able to customize a mobility
solution for each individual.

December 2017 OrthoPets Case Study for the Canine Rehabilitation Institute: Sophie

Sophie was diagnosed with an intertarsal subluxation in July 2016. The owners declined surgery and instead pursued an orthosis. The goal of her orthosis was to provide support and stability to her tarsus as well to avoid surgery. Special considerations needed to be taken with her thin hair coat and delicate skin.sophie-orthopets-1-1217.png
Due to the nature of the subluxation, Sophie required a non-articulating tarsal device with an articulating paw segment. By not allowing motion to persist at the tarsus, the orthosis is able to appropriately restrict undesirable movement of the intertarsal subluxation. While the paw segment was articulating, the goal was offer functional ROM of her SDF and DDF enabling pathofunctional biomechanics of the paw. Her metatarsophalangeal joint range of motion was limited due to the intertarsal subluxation so the paw was articulated to accommodate external wedges that would allow the prescribing veterinarian to adjust the paw’s angle as the patient restored normal ROM. Allowing excessive motion of the paw segment other than to adjust the paw angle can put additional forces on the subluxation. Rather than the standard foam liner, Sophie received a removable prosthetic liner that included her crus and pez (tibia/fibula, tarsus and metatarsals). This style of liner allowed forces to be distributed evenly throughout the affected limb providing additional protection to her skin.
Sophie has had her orthosis for a year and a half. Her owners report she is doing wonderfully and are grateful that she is comfortable and back to her old self. Great job, Sophie!